Stained linoleum floor in closet - how to handle replacement cost?

Tenant Raised Issues
1

Hey everyone, I’m in a bit of a pickle. I’m moving out of my rental unit and I’ve noticed a stain on the linoleum flooring in one of the closets. It’s pretty noticeable - bright pink from some washer fluid that leaked. I’ve been here for 4 years and the floor wasn’t new when I moved in. Should I tell my LL before the move-out inspection? I’m thinking of offering to pay for replacing just that section, or maybe a prorated amount based on the floor’s age. Any advice?

3 Likes
2

First off, don’t panic. Here’s what you need to consider:

  1. Age of the floor: Linoleum typically has a lifespan of 10-20 years. If it’s older than that, you might not be liable for any costs.

  2. Normal wear and tear: The LTB has a broad definition of this. A stain in a storage closet might fall under this category, especially after 4 years.

  3. Accidental damage: If this was truly an accident (which it sounds like it was), you may not be fully liable.

  4. Prorated costs: If you are found liable, it would likely only be for the depreciated value of the floor, not a full replacement.

My advice? Don’t offer anything upfront. Wait for the LL to bring it up during the inspection. If they do, explain it was an accident and discuss a fair solution. If you can’t agree, they’ll have to take it to the LTB, where you’ll likely end up paying less (if anything at all).

8 Likes
3

As a LL, I’d appreciate a heads up. It shows good faith. But don’t offer to pay anything yet. Let the LL assess the damage first.

2 Likes
4

Thanks for the advice! @tmurphy, you mentioned the age of the floor. I’m not sure exactly how old it is, but there was already some damage noted when I moved in 4 years ago. Does that help my case?

5

Absolutely! Pre-existing damage is important. It suggests the floor was already well into its lifespan when you moved in. Make sure you have documentation of that initial damage - your move-in inspection report or photos would be ideal. This strengthens your position that you shouldn’t be responsible for a full replacement cost, even if the LL tries to push for it.