MQ and KF v PL and R L

Last updated: July 22, 2024

Order

Ordered by Frank Ebner,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: January 5, 2022
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Landlord

Ordered Amount

$1,038

to Tenants

ContentionLow

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: MQ and KF v PL and R L, 2022 CanLII 52499 (ON LTB)

File Number: TNT-12509-19

Timeline

Application Date

Jan 2019

35 months

Hearing Date

Dec 2021

27 days

Order Date

Jan 5, 2022

Decision

The landlords were ordered to pay the tenants $1,038.54, which includes $885 in illegal rent collected and $43.54 in rent deposit interest. The tenants' other applications were dismissed.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Tenants applied for orders related to illegal rent, illegal rent deposit, reduction or discontinuance of services, illegal entry, substantial interference, and harassment. The landlords acknowledged some of the issues and agreed to refund the tenants.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlords agreed to refund illegal amounts
  • Landlords collected illegal rent and illegal rent deposit
  • Tenants did not establish illegal entry, substantial interference, or harassment
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Landlords acknowledged collecting illegal rent and rent deposit

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Arguments

Landlords collected illegal rent and rent deposit

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Tenants paid illegal rent and rent deposit as requested by landlords

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Financial Details

Lawful Rent

$1,600

Rent Deposit

$1,600

Deposit Interest

$43

Other Amount

$885

Illegal rent collected

Ordered Amount

$1,038 (to Tenants)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

ZAHRA PROPERTIES v UFOEGBUNE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 24, 2025
Toronto
Review Order

Toronto tenant's eviction for over $23,000 in rent arrears upheld after their counterclaims of harassment and assault were dismissed on procedural grounds.

Tenant Sent Invalid Notice
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

PAK PETROLEUM INC v DEGUIRE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
VANKLEEK HILL

Tenant facing eviction for over $4,700 in unpaid rent despite claims of no hot water and being bitten twice by rats.

Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

Thomas v Thomas

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Ottawa

LTB rules the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to siblings sharing a home, as the shared kitchen exemption holds despite a standard lease and the landlord's temporary absences.

Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionModerate

Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Port Carling
Review Order

LTB upholds ruling against a corporate tenant and admonishes their lawyer for submitting fake, AI-generated legal citations.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionExtreme

ZAHRA PROPERTIES v UFOEGBUNE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 24, 2025
Toronto
Review Order

Toronto tenant's eviction for over $23,000 in rent arrears upheld after their counterclaims of harassment and assault were dismissed on procedural grounds.

Tenant Sent Invalid Notice
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

PAK PETROLEUM INC v DEGUIRE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
VANKLEEK HILL

Tenant facing eviction for over $4,700 in unpaid rent despite claims of no hot water and being bitten twice by rats.

Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

Thomas v Thomas

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Ottawa

LTB rules the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to siblings sharing a home, as the shared kitchen exemption holds despite a standard lease and the landlord's temporary absences.

Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionModerate

Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Port Carling
Review Order

LTB upholds ruling against a corporate tenant and admonishes their lawyer for submitting fake, AI-generated legal citations.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionExtreme

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform