C.M. v E.B.

Last updated: July 30, 2024

Order

Ordered by ,Tribunals Ontario  under Section 69, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

Order Date: August 31, 2016
Contested Dispute

Decision in favor of

Tenant

Ordered Amount

$275

to Tenant

ContentionExtreme

Agree with the ruling?

Citation: C.M. v E.B., 2016 CanLII 72218 (ON LTB)

File Number: TET-70649-16

Timeline

Tenancy End Date

Aug 2016

4 days

Hearing Date

Aug 2016

21 days

Order Date

Aug 31, 2016

Decision

The tenancy is terminated effective August 6, 2016 due to the Landlord's harassment and illegal entry. The Landlord is ordered to pay the Tenant a rent abatement of $275 for the illegal entries and harassment.

Unlock Order Content

Dispute

Tenant applied for an order determining that Landlord harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with them, entered the rental unit illegally, substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex, and withheld or deliberately interfered with the reasonable supply of a vital service.

Unlock Order Content

Determinations

  • Landlord entered unit without proper written notice
  • Tenant's claim of substantial interference not supported
  • Landlord harassed, coerced, and interfered with Tenant
  • Tenancy terminated effective August 6, 2016
  • Unlock Order Content

Landlord's Arguments

Arguments

Treated Tenant like family, believed it was her right to enter unit

Unlock Order Content

Actions and Evidence

Landlord admitted to entering unit without proper notice, documenting Tenant's boyfriend's visits, and telling Tenant to move out

Unlock Order Content

Considerations

Continued entering unit after being told not to, told Tenant to move out

Unlock Order Content

Tenant's Arguments

Actions and Evidence

Tenant moved out on August 6, 2016 due to Landlord's harassment

Unlock Order Content

Need assistance from an expert?

Financial Details

Lawful Rent

$550

Other Amount

$275

Rent abatement for illegal entries and harassment

Ordered Amount

$275 (to Tenant)

Similar Cases

Click to switch between order outcomes

ZAHRA PROPERTIES v UFOEGBUNE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 24, 2025
Toronto
Review Order

Toronto tenant's eviction for over $23,000 in rent arrears upheld after their counterclaims of harassment and assault were dismissed on procedural grounds.

Tenant Sent Invalid Notice
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

PAK PETROLEUM INC v DEGUIRE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
VANKLEEK HILL

Tenant facing eviction for over $4,700 in unpaid rent despite claims of no hot water and being bitten twice by rats.

Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

Thomas v Thomas

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Ottawa

LTB rules the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to siblings sharing a home, as the shared kitchen exemption holds despite a standard lease and the landlord's temporary absences.

Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionModerate

Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Port Carling
Review Order

LTB upholds ruling against a corporate tenant and admonishes their lawyer for submitting fake, AI-generated legal citations.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionExtreme

ZAHRA PROPERTIES v UFOEGBUNE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 24, 2025
Toronto
Review Order

Toronto tenant's eviction for over $23,000 in rent arrears upheld after their counterclaims of harassment and assault were dismissed on procedural grounds.

Tenant Sent Invalid Notice
Testimony Contested
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

PAK PETROLEUM INC v DEGUIRE

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
VANKLEEK HILL

Tenant facing eviction for over $4,700 in unpaid rent despite claims of no hot water and being bitten twice by rats.

Testimony Contested
Eviction Relief Granted
Section 82 Issues Raised and Denied
ContentionExtreme

Thomas v Thomas

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Ottawa

LTB rules the Residential Tenancies Act does not apply to siblings sharing a home, as the shared kitchen exemption holds despite a standard lease and the landlord's temporary absences.

Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionModerate

Pennytech Inc v Superior Building Group Limited

Contested Dispute
Landlord Wins
July 21, 2025
Port Carling
Review Order

LTB upholds ruling against a corporate tenant and admonishes their lawyer for submitting fake, AI-generated legal citations.

Tenant Aggravating Factor
Testimony Contested
RTA Not Applicable
ContentionExtreme

Unlock More Similar Orders

Access our complete database of similar cases to make more informed decisions and better understand LTB rulings.

Compare outcomes of similar cases to assess your position

Analyze patterns in LTB decisions for your case type

Build stronger arguments with real case references

Share:

Latest Insights from Our Blog

Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions

Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered

Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.

Find Legal Professionals

Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.

Browse Professionals

Post Your Legal Needs

Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.

Post a Bounty

Join thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform